Um... hello? Why don't you have an open mind and not base your opinion on what someone is saying in a documentary? Read actual scientific facts explained by experts that the proponents of the 9/11-conspiracy won't tell you!

I guess you didn't refer the people who watched Loose Change and then debunked it.

WTC 7 fell because it was on fire. Have you ever heard of other buildings collapsing because they were on fire?

1 Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2 Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3.Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4.Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5.Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph
6.Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7.Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8.1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
9.Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
10.Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11.Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12.Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
13.Evidence of explosives found in dust samples
14.No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

Wow, the government did pretty shoddy work. You'd think they would have had a better plan.

Speak of which, why haven't they killed you yet for exposing them? I'm sure you have someone tracking your online activities.

Is there an IGNORE feature? If you refuse to watch the documentary, that is your choice.

I don't think your attitude is suitable and I don't appreciate it one bit.

Yes, not reading my posts if they are upsetting you. Your posts are apparently upsetting me, since I can't keep myself from replying to them. And I'm sorry if I offended you, but ignoring me won't get the government off your back for exposing their dastardly ways.

Perhaps you didn't notice, but hating America is sort of offensive to some people. I'm sorry that you believe such things, but there's really nothing more I can do.

You are so sarcastic it's pathetic.

You accuse me of hating America?

You are a piece of work. I haven't posted here in a long time and you have totally ruined my experience here and I will no longer be participating in this forum.

You are a real jerk.

I'm sorry.

I'm not aware of any Pagans worshipping on Christmas nowadays. I think we as Christians pretty much own Dec. 25th now. But I could be wrong and if I am ... for certain others will correct me. :)

>>The KJV does mention the word "Easter", but it's a mistranslation of Pascha (aka. Passover in English). Most other bible translations (ie. NIV, NKJV, etc..) have corrected this mistranslation.<<

“Pascha” notwithstanding, isn’t there at least a bit of ambiguity to the texts of Acts 12: 3,4?—and that “Easter” is really the correct translation?

Acts 12:3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put [him] in prison, and delivered [him] to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

Nu 28:16 And in the fourteenth day of the first month [is] the passover of the LORD.
Nu 28:17 And in the fifteenth day of this month [is] the feast: seven days shall unleavened bread be eaten.

>>Christmas and Easter are both pagan holidays that were "Christianized" (by man, not God).<<

But didn’t Gd tell us that the Sun, Moon, and stars were given to us for signs and seasons?—without proscription? Are signs and seasons made void simply because “pagans” also utilize those signs and seasons?

>>The bible clearly tells us to not worship God the same way the pagans do (See Deuteronomy 12:29-31 and Leviticus 18:1-4).<<

Wasn’t the injunction against becoming ‘ensnared’ by the “doings of the land of Canaan”?—and not to the observation of “signs and seasons”?

SivartM I most say that you have made some really good points in all your posts. And definitely agree with you.
And to no one in particular: As far as the buildings collapsing in 13 seconds! When they finally collapsed it took 13 seconds, because of all the weight, but if you watched most of the day it took hours before the buildings actually did collapse! And the first building struck didn't collapse until after the second one collapsed first.

pk